The current debate about Cannabis and addiction prevention is becoming increasingly acute in politics and the media. The equation of cannabis with hard drugs or even with Behavioral addictions such as gaming addiction or excessive mobile phone use. This development is alarming for patient representatives: They fear that stigmatization and repression will Care for seriously ill people massively endanger.
Cannabis is a medicine – not a lifestyle
For many chronically ill people, Cannabis is an indispensable medicine. Whether at chronic pain, multiple sclerosis, epilepsy or cancerCannabis flowers and extracts relieve symptoms when conventional therapies do not work.
-
Fast effect: Inhaled flowers work within minutes – crucial for breakthrough pain or spasticity.
-
Natural active ingredient profile: The interaction of cannabinoids and terpenes (“entourage effect”) cannot be replaced by isolated preparations.
-
Patient reports: Many report better tolerance than purely standardized products.
A blanket stigma degrades cannabis from a medical tool into a “lifestyle drug” – and disregards the reality of those affected.
The central demands of patient representatives
1. Differentiation instead of stigmatization
Cannabis should not be compared to hard drugs such as heroin or cocaine.
-
Study situationWhile hard drugs have an extreme potential for addiction, cannabis presents a significantly lower risk.
-
WHO & EMCDDA emphasize: Cannabis carries risks, but the comparison with opioids is scientifically untenable.
👉 Demand: A factual debate without false equations.
2. Security of supply instead of repression
Examples like Bayern show that restrictive government practices even affect legal models such as Cannabis social clubs To block.
-
Repressive measures deprive patients of access.
-
Instead, it needs Specialist departments, trained doctors and reliable delivery structures.
3. Secure telemedicine
-
In rural areas Telemedicine is often the only optionto get cannabis prescribed.
-
Current political initiatives aim to restrict telemedicine for medical cannabis – with fatal consequences for healthcare.
👉 Demand: Telemedicine must gesichert and not be stigmatized.
4. Make home cultivation realistic
-
The law allows maximum 3 plants per person.
-
For medicinal preparations such as Oils, ointments or high-dose extracts the material is barely sufficient.
-
Patient representatives are therefore calling for adapted regulations for medical needs.
5. Expand medical training
-
Although cannabis has been available for prescription since 2017, there are still far too few statutory health insurance doctorswho issue prescriptions.
-
Reasons: Uncertainty, lack of training and bureaucracy.
-
Solution: Mandatory further training, Integration of cannabis into medical curricula and new care models.
Political responsibility
The patient representatives emphasize:
-
Cannabis must evidence-based regulation .
-
Equating it with hard drugs or lifestyle clichés undermines trust.
-
Politics must Security of supply, research and education – not on symbolic politics.
Conclusion
The voice of the patients is clear: Cannabis is no comparison to hard drugs. Anyone who claims the opposite is stigmatizing and jeopardizing care.
Instead of repressive measures, we need:
-
Differentiation & Enlightenment,
-
secure access & telemedicine,
-
better training for doctors,
-
realistic home cultivation rules.
Just one fact-based, responsible drug and health policy does justice to the reality of patients. Anything else is irresponsible.
